Konstantin Ladutenko 7 years ago
parent
commit
933774ac45
1 changed files with 6 additions and 5 deletions
  1. 6 5
      main.tex

+ 6 - 5
main.tex

@@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ Maxwell equations with kinetic equations describing nonlinear EHP
 generation.  Three-dimensional transient variation of the material
 dielectric permittivity is calculated for nanoparticles of several
 sizes. The obtained results propose a novel strategy to create
-complicated non-symmetrical nanostructures by using photo-excited
-single spherical silicon nanoparticles. Moreover, we show that a dense
+complicated non-symmetrical nanostructures by using single photo-excited
+spherical silicon nanoparticles. Moreover, we show that a dense
 EHP can be generated at deeply subwavelength scale
 ($\approx$$\lambda$$^3$/100) supporting the formation of small
 metalized parts inside the nanoparticle. In fact, such effects
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ length will be around 5--10~nm for N$_e$ close to N$_cr$.
 \centering
 \includegraphics[width=0.495\textwidth]{mie-fdtd-3}
 \caption{\label{mie-fdtd} (a, b) First four Lorentz-Mie coefficients
-  ($a_1$, $a_2$, $b_1$, $b_2$) and the factor of asymmetry $G$
+  ($a_1$, $a_2$, $b_1$, $b_2$) and factors of asymmetry $G_I$, $G_{I^2}$ 
   according to Mie theory at fixed wavelength 800~nm. (c, d) Intensity
   distribution calculated by Mie theory and (e, f) EHP distribution
   for low free carrier densities $N_e \approx 10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$ by
@@ -526,7 +526,8 @@ license.
 
 %\subsection{Effect of the irradiation intensity on EHP generation}
 
- Firstly, we analyze the intensity distribution inside the non-excited
+ Firstly, we analyze Mie coefficients (Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b) ) and
+ the intensity distribution inside the non-excited
  Si nanoparticle as a function of its size for a fixed laser
  wavelength $\lambda = 800$ nm.  \red{We introduce $G^I$ factor of
    asymmetry, corresponding to difference between the integral of
@@ -535,7 +536,7 @@ license.
    $G_I = (I^{front}-I^{back})/(I^{front}+I^{back})$, where
    $I^{front}=\int_{0}^{+R} |E(z)|^2dz$ and
    $I^{back}=\int_{-R}^{0} |E(z)|^2dz$. (Is it correct???Or
-   integration over some angles are needed)} Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(b)
+   integration over some angles are needed)} Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b)
  shows the $G$ factor as a function of the nanoparticle size. For the
  nanoparticles of sizes below the first magnetic dipole resonance, the
  intensity is enhanced in the front side as in Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(c)