change

main.tex

@@ -481,15 +481,15 @@ associated with the time-dependent free carrier response
  $$ \end{cases} \end{align}
 
 \subsection{Mie calculations}
-A steady-state interaction of electromagnetic wave with a spherical
-particle has a well-known analytical solution described by a Mie
-theory~\cite{Bohren1983}. It is only valid in the absence of nonlinear
-optical response, thus we can compare it against above-mentioned
-FDTD-EHP model only for small plasma densities, where we can neglect
-EHP impact to the refractive index. Non-stationary nature of a
-femtosecond pulse increase the complexity of the analysis. A detailed
-discussion on the relation between Mie theory and FDTD-EHP model will
-be provided in the next section.
+A steady-state interaction of a plain electromagnetic wave with a
+spherical particle has a well-known analytical solution described by a
+Mie theory~\cite{Bohren1983}. It is only valid in the absence of
+nonlinear optical response, thus we can compare it against
+above-mentioned FDTD-EHP model only for small plasma densities, where
+we can neglect EHP impact to the refractive index. Non-stationary
+nature of a femtosecond pulse increase the complexity of the
+analysis. A detailed discussion on the relation between Mie theory and
+FDTD-EHP model will be provided in the next section.
 
 We used Scattnlay program to evaluate calculations of Mie coefficients
 and near-field distribution~\cite{Ladutenko2017}.  This program is