|
|
@@ -481,15 +481,15 @@ associated with the time-dependent free carrier response
|
|
|
$$ \end{cases} \end{align}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\subsection{Mie calculations}
|
|
|
-A steady-state interaction of electromagnetic wave with a spherical
|
|
|
-particle has a well-known analytical solution described by a Mie
|
|
|
-theory~\cite{Bohren1983}. It is only valid in the absence of nonlinear
|
|
|
-optical response, thus we can compare it against above-mentioned
|
|
|
-FDTD-EHP model only for small plasma densities, where we can neglect
|
|
|
-EHP impact to the refractive index. Non-stationary nature of a
|
|
|
-femtosecond pulse increase the complexity of the analysis. A detailed
|
|
|
-discussion on the relation between Mie theory and FDTD-EHP model will
|
|
|
-be provided in the next section.
|
|
|
+A steady-state interaction of a plain electromagnetic wave with a
|
|
|
+spherical particle has a well-known analytical solution described by a
|
|
|
+Mie theory~\cite{Bohren1983}. It is only valid in the absence of
|
|
|
+nonlinear optical response, thus we can compare it against
|
|
|
+above-mentioned FDTD-EHP model only for small plasma densities, where
|
|
|
+we can neglect EHP impact to the refractive index. Non-stationary
|
|
|
+nature of a femtosecond pulse increase the complexity of the
|
|
|
+analysis. A detailed discussion on the relation between Mie theory and
|
|
|
+FDTD-EHP model will be provided in the next section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We used Scattnlay program to evaluate calculations of Mie coefficients
|
|
|
and near-field distribution~\cite{Ladutenko2017}. This program is
|
