Konstantin Ladutenko 7 years ago
parent
commit
3e9ce7fb55
1 changed files with 16 additions and 30 deletions
  1. 16 30
      main.tex

+ 16 - 30
main.tex

@@ -514,15 +514,16 @@ license.
  side of the NP as demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact,
  side of the NP as demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact,
  very similar EHP distributions can be obtained by applying Maxwell's
  very similar EHP distributions can be obtained by applying Maxwell's
  equations coupled with the rate equation for relatively weak
  equations coupled with the rate equation for relatively weak
- excitation with EHP concentration of $N_e \approx
- 10^{20}$~cm$^{-3}$. The optical properties do not change considerably
- due to the excitation according to (\ref{Index}). Therefore, the
- excitation processes follow the intensity distribution. However, such
- coincidence was achieved under quasi-stationary conditions, after the
- electric field made enough oscillations inside the Si NP, transient
- analysis reveal much more details.
-
- To achieve a qualitative description for evolution of the EHP
+ excitation with EHP concentration of $N_e \approx 10^{20}$~cm$^{-3}$,
+ see Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(e,f). The optical properties do not change
+ considerably due to the excitation according to
+ (\ref{Index}). Therefore, the excitation processes follow the
+ intensity distribution. However, such coincidence was achieved under
+ quasi-stationary conditions, after the electric field made enough
+ oscillations inside the Si NP. Further on we present transient
+ analysis, which reveals much more details.
+
+ To achieve a quantative description for evolution of the EHP
  distribution during the \textit{fs} pulse, we introduced another
  distribution during the \textit{fs} pulse, we introduced another
  asymmetry factor
  asymmetry factor
  $G_{N_e} = (N_e^{front}-N_e^{back})/(N_e^{front}+N_e^{back})$
  $G_{N_e} = (N_e^{front}-N_e^{back})/(N_e^{front}+N_e^{back})$
@@ -533,28 +534,13 @@ license.
  optical response of the excited Si NP. When $G_{N_e}$ significantly
  optical response of the excited Si NP. When $G_{N_e}$ significantly
  differs from $0$, this assumption, however, could not be
  differs from $0$, this assumption, however, could not be
  justified. In what follows, we discuss the results of the numerical
  justified. In what follows, we discuss the results of the numerical
- modeling of the temporal evolution of the asymmetry factor $G_{N_e}$
- in Fig.~\ref{time-evolution} revealing the EHP evolution stages during pulse
- duration shown in Fig.~\ref{plasma-grid}.
+ modeling (see Fig.~\ref{time-evolution}) of the temporal evolution of
+ EHP densities and the asymmetry factor $G_{N_e}$. It reveals the EHP
+ evolution stages during pulse duration. Typical change of the
+ permittivity corresponding to each stage is shown in
+ Fig.~\ref{plasma-grid}.
 
 
- % Fig. \ref{Mie} demonstrates the temporal evolution of the EHP
- % generated inside the silicon NP of $R \approx 105$~nm. Here,
- % irradiation by high-intensity, $I\approx $ from XXX to YYY (???),
- % ultrashort laser Gaussian pulse is considered. Snapshots of free
- % carrier density taken at different times correspond to different
- % total amount of the deposited energy (different laser intensities).
-
-%To better analyze the degree of inhomogeneity, we introduce the EHP
-% asymmetry parameter, $G$, which is defined as a relation between the
-% average electron density generated in the front side of the
-% NP and the average electron density in the back side, as
-% shown in Fig. \ref{plasma-grid}. During the femtosecond pulse interaction,
-% this parameter significantly varies.
-
-
-
-
- To describe all the stages of powerful enough light interaction with
+ To describe all the stages of light non-linear interaction with
  Si NP, we present the calculation results obtained by using Maxwell's
  Si NP, we present the calculation results obtained by using Maxwell's
  equations coupled with electron kinetics equations for different
  equations coupled with electron kinetics equations for different
  radii for resonant and non-resonant conditions. In this case, the
  radii for resonant and non-resonant conditions. In this case, the