Przeglądaj źródła

Update on Overleaf.

k.ladutenko 7 lat temu
rodzic
commit
3ba6443538
1 zmienionych plików z 6 dodań i 7 usunięć
  1. 6 7
      main.tex

+ 6 - 7
main.tex

@@ -526,8 +526,7 @@ license.
 
 
  Firstly, we analyze Mie coefficients (Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}) and
  Firstly, we analyze Mie coefficients (Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}) and
  the intensity distribution inside the non-excited Si NP as
  the intensity distribution inside the non-excited Si NP as
- a function of its size for a fixed laser wavelength $\lambda = 800$
- nm.  We introduce $G_I$ factor of asymmetry, corresponding to
+ a function of its size for a fixed laser wavelength $\lambda = 800$~nm.  We introduce $G_I$ factor of asymmetry, corresponding to
  difference between the volume integral of intensity in the front side
  difference between the volume integral of intensity in the front side
  of the NP to that in the back side normalized to their sum:
  of the NP to that in the back side normalized to their sum:
  $G_I = (I^{front}-I^{back})/(I^{front}+I^{back})$, where
  $G_I = (I^{front}-I^{back})/(I^{front}+I^{back})$, where
@@ -540,7 +539,7 @@ license.
  sizes below the first magnetic dipole resonance, the intensity is
  sizes below the first magnetic dipole resonance, the intensity is
  enhanced in the front side as in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(c) and
  enhanced in the front side as in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(c) and
  $G_I > 0$. The behavior changes near the size resonance value,
  $G_I > 0$. The behavior changes near the size resonance value,
- corresponding to $R \approx 105$ nm. In contrast, for larger sizes,
+ corresponding to $R \approx 105$~nm. In contrast, for larger sizes,
  the intensity is enhanced in the back side of the NP as
  the intensity is enhanced in the back side of the NP as
  demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact, the similar EHP
  demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact, the similar EHP
  distributions can be obtained by applying Maxwell's equations coupled
  distributions can be obtained by applying Maxwell's equations coupled
@@ -626,12 +625,12 @@ license.
  Fig.~\ref{fig3}). The EHP density is still relatively not high to
  Fig.~\ref{fig3}). The EHP density is still relatively not high to
  influence the EHP evolution and strong diffusion rates but already
  influence the EHP evolution and strong diffusion rates but already
  enough to change the optical properties locally. Below the magnetic
  enough to change the optical properties locally. Below the magnetic
- dipole resonance $R \approx 100$ nm, the EHP is mostly localized in
+ dipole resonance $R \approx 100$~nm, the EHP is mostly localized in
  the front side of the NP as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}(c). The highest
  the front side of the NP as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}(c). The highest
  stationary asymmetry factor $G_{N_e} \approx 0.5--0.6$ is achieved in this case. At the magnetic dipole
  stationary asymmetry factor $G_{N_e} \approx 0.5--0.6$ is achieved in this case. At the magnetic dipole
  resonance conditions, the EHP distribution has a toroidal shape and
  resonance conditions, the EHP distribution has a toroidal shape and
  is much closer to homogeneous distribution. In contrast, above the
  is much closer to homogeneous distribution. In contrast, above the
- magnetic dipole resonant size for $R = 115$ nm, the $G_{N_e} < 0$ due
+ magnetic dipole resonant size for $R = 115$~nm, the $G_{N_e} < 0$ due
  to dominantly EHP localized in the back side of the NP.
  to dominantly EHP localized in the back side of the NP.
 
 
  For the higher excitation conditions, the optical properties of
  For the higher excitation conditions, the optical properties of
@@ -659,8 +658,8 @@ license.
  It is worth noting that it is possible to achieve a formation of
  It is worth noting that it is possible to achieve a formation of
  deeply subwavelength EHP regions due to high field localization. The
  deeply subwavelength EHP regions due to high field localization. The
  smallest EHP localization and the larger asymmetry factor are
  smallest EHP localization and the larger asymmetry factor are
- achieved below the magnetic dipole resonant conditions for $R < 100$
- nm. Thus, the EHP distribution in Fig.~\ref{fig2}(c) is optimal for
+ achieved below the magnetic dipole resonant conditions for $R < 100$~nm.
+ Thus, the EHP distribution in Fig.~\ref{fig2}(c) is optimal for
  symmetry breaking in Si NP, as it results in the larger asymmetry
  symmetry breaking in Si NP, as it results in the larger asymmetry
  factor $G_{N_e}$ and higher electron densities $N_e$. We stress here
  factor $G_{N_e}$ and higher electron densities $N_e$. We stress here
  that such regime could be still safe for NP due to the very small
  that such regime could be still safe for NP due to the very small