Konstantin Ladutenko 7 years ago
parent
commit
e672d61e71
1 changed files with 19 additions and 14 deletions
  1. 19 14
      main.tex

+ 19 - 14
main.tex

@@ -245,7 +245,10 @@ distributions in silicon nanoparticle around a magnetic resonance.}
 On the other hand, plasma explosion imaging technique has been used to
 On the other hand, plasma explosion imaging technique has been used to
 observe electron-hole plasmas (EHP), produced by femtosecond lasers,
 observe electron-hole plasmas (EHP), produced by femtosecond lasers,
 inside nanoparticles~\cite{Hickstein2014}. Particularly, a strongly
 inside nanoparticles~\cite{Hickstein2014}. Particularly, a strongly
-localized EHP in the front side of NaCl nanocrystals of $R = 100$ nm
+localized EHP in the front side~\footnote{The incident wave propagate
+  in positive direction of $z$ axis. Geometric center of the nanoparticle is
+  located at $z=0$, front side corresponds to nanoparticle volume with
+$z>0$ and back side for $z<0$} of NaCl nanocrystals of $R = 100$ nm
 was revealed. The forward ejection of ions in this case was attributed
 was revealed. The forward ejection of ions in this case was attributed
 to a nanolensing effect inside the nanoparticle and the intensity
 to a nanolensing effect inside the nanoparticle and the intensity
 enhancement as low as $10\%$ on the far side of the nanoparticle. Much
 enhancement as low as $10\%$ on the far side of the nanoparticle. Much
@@ -527,19 +530,21 @@ license.
 %\subsection{Effect of the irradiation intensity on EHP generation}
 %\subsection{Effect of the irradiation intensity on EHP generation}
 
 
  Firstly, we analyze Mie coefficients (Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b) ) and
  Firstly, we analyze Mie coefficients (Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b) ) and
- the intensity distribution inside the non-excited
- Si nanoparticle as a function of its size for a fixed laser
- wavelength $\lambda = 800$ nm.  We introduce $G_I$ factor of
-   asymmetry, corresponding to difference between the volume integral of
-   intensity in the front side of the nanoparticle to that in the back
-   side normalized to their sum:
-   $G_I = (I^{front}-I^{back})/(I^{front}+I^{back})$, where
-   $I^{front}=\int_{(z>0)}|E|^2d{\mathrm{v}}$ and
-   $I^{back}=\int_{(z<0)} |E|^2d{\mathrm{v}}$.  Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b)
- shows the $G$ factor as a function of the nanoparticle size. For the
- nanoparticles of sizes below the first magnetic dipole resonance, the
- intensity is enhanced in the front side as in Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(c)
- and $G_I > 0$. The behavior changes near the size resonance value,
+ the intensity distribution inside the non-excited Si nanoparticle as
+ a function of its size for a fixed laser wavelength $\lambda = 800$
+ nm.  We introduce $G_I$ factor of asymmetry, corresponding to
+ difference between the volume integral of intensity in the front side
+ of the nanoparticle to that in the back side normalized to their sum:
+ $G_I = (I^{front}-I^{back})/(I^{front}+I^{back})$, where
+ $I^{front}=\int_{(z>0)}|E|^2d{\mathrm{v}}$ and
+ $I^{back}=\int_{(z<0)} |E|^2d{\mathrm{v}}$. The factor $G_{I^2}$ was
+ introduced in a similar way using volume integrals of squared
+ intensity as a better option to predict EHP asymmetry due to
+ two-photon absorption.  Fig.~\ref{mie-fdtd}(b) shows $G$ factors
+ as a function of the nanoparticle size. For the nanoparticles of
+ sizes below the first magnetic dipole resonance, the intensity is
+ enhanced in the front side as in Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(c) and
+ $G_I > 0$. The behavior changes near the size resonance value,
  corresponding to $R \approx 105$ nm. In contrast, for larger sizes,
  corresponding to $R \approx 105$ nm. In contrast, for larger sizes,
  the intensity is enhanced in the back side of the nanoparticle as
  the intensity is enhanced in the back side of the nanoparticle as
  demonstrated in Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact, the similar EHP
  demonstrated in Fig. \ref{mie-fdtd}(d). In fact, the similar EHP