|
|
@@ -526,8 +526,8 @@ license.
|
|
|
distribution during the \textit{fs} pulse, we introduced another
|
|
|
asymmetry factor
|
|
|
$G_{N_e} = (N_e^{front}-N_e^{back})/(N_e^{front}+N_e^{back})$
|
|
|
- indicating the relationship between the average EHP densities in the front and in the back halves of the NP, defined as $N_e^{front}=2\int_{(z>0)} {N_e}d{\mathrm{v}}/V$ and
|
|
|
- $N_e^{back}=2\int_{(z<0)} {N_e}d{\mathrm{v}}/V$, where $V = \frac{4}{3}\pi{R}^3$ is the volume of the nanosphere. In this way, $G_{N_e} = 0$ corresponds to the quasi-homogeneous case and the assumption of the
|
|
|
+ indicating the relationship between the average EHP densities in the front and in the back halves of the NP, defined as $N_e^{front}=\frac{2}{V}\int_{(z>0)} {N_e}d{\mathrm{v}}$ and
|
|
|
+ $N_e^{back}=\frac{2}{V}\int_{(z<0)} {N_e}d{\mathrm{v}}$, where $V = \frac{4}{3}\pi{R}^3$ is the volume of the nanosphere. In this way, $G_{N_e} = 0$ corresponds to the quasi-homogeneous case and the assumption of the
|
|
|
NP homogeneous EHP distribution can be made to investigate the
|
|
|
optical response of the excited Si NP. When $G_{N_e}$ significantly
|
|
|
differs from $0$, this assumption, however, could not be
|
