|
@@ -465,6 +465,20 @@ associated with the time-dependent free carrier response
|
|
|
\displaystyle{Im(\epsilon^\ast) = \frac{{e^2}N_e\nu_e}{\epsilon_0m_e^*\omega(\omega^2+{\nu_e}^2)}.}
|
|
|
$$ \end{cases} \end{align}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+\subsection{Mie calculations}
|
|
|
+A steady-state interaction of electromagnetic wave with a spherical
|
|
|
+particle has a well-known analytical solution described by a Mie
|
|
|
+theory~\cite{Bohren1983}. It is only valid in the absence of nonlinear optical
|
|
|
+response, thus we can compare it against above-mentioned FDTD-EHP model
|
|
|
+only for small plasma densities, where we can neglect EHP impact to the
|
|
|
+refractive index. Non-stationary nature of a femtosecond pulse increase the
|
|
|
+complexity of the analysis. A detailed discussion on the relation between Mie theory
|
|
|
+and FDTD-EHP model will be provided in the next section.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+We used Scattnlay program to evaluate calculations of Mie coefficients
|
|
|
+and near-field distribution~\cite{Ladutenko2017}. This program is available
|
|
|
+online at GitHub~\cite{Scattnlay-web} under open source license.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\section{Results and discussion}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
|
|
@@ -717,7 +731,7 @@ was partially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Researches
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%%REFERENCES%%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
-\bibliography{References.bib} %You need to replace "rsc" on this line
|
|
|
+\bibliography{References} %You need to replace "rsc" on this line
|
|
|
%with the name of your .bib file
|
|
|
\bibliographystyle{rsc} %the RSC's .bst file
|
|
|
|